"Moon Landing"

Clifurd · 04-20-2009, 03:10 PM

Where would topics such as exploiting the 'fakeness' of the supposed moon landing be posted?

Mingus · 04-20-2009, 03:15 PM

Conspiracies, I suppose, though, since you've already made a thread, just make it here. Mods can move it.

Clifurd · 04-20-2009, 03:23 PM

Oh, fair enough lol. Thank you.

Clifurd · 04-20-2009, 03:27 PM

Has anyone reviewed the moon landing footage at a higher speed? Most of the ones on youtube are sped up either too much or not enough, so it makes them look strange. You can totally tell that they are in Earth's gravity though.

kidflash2008 · 04-21-2009, 10:36 AM

Sorry, Clifurd, but we did go to the moon. The logistics are there to prove it, and it would of meant thousands of people either kept in the dark or keeping their mouths shut on such a secret.

Mythbusters did a good episode on the moon landing and did show how it would of been too difficult to fake the moon walk.

It would also mean that all the astronauts who have been to the moon are lying. I do not see how that would be the case, and Buzz Aldrin did deck a man for calling him one.

Put fake moon landing with the other urban legends.

Clifurd · 04-21-2009, 09:18 PM

ROFL. We CANNOT go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt. look up the movie: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon: it's only 40 min and the whole time they are building up your attention for one piece of footage that lasts about 10 min. To create the illusion that they were 130,000 miles above the earth, the astronauts put an object that was cut int a crescent shape and placed into the circle shaped window to fake the Earth's day and night shadow, and they blocked all points where sunlight could enter the craft and put the camera far away from the window so it looked like a planet from a distance. Really outside the window was nothing but earth because they were still in low orbit. Why, if they had a Color, high resolution camera, did they use that crappy black and white camera? why are there only 2 pictures of Armstrong? you can watch the footage of when they are on the moon. Another good point is that the shadows of the astronauts and other objects, intersect. Shadows do not intercept if there is only one source of light (the sun). Supposedly they used (can't remember how many) car batteries to run air conditioning to keep the Lunar Lander at a cool 70-some degrees when it was like 260 degrees outside. If you watch the "moon jeep" lol, footage at a faster rate you can completely tell with common sense that it is driving in earths gravity. Same thing with the video where they are throwing rocks, it's not a sped up video, it is still slow motion and you can still tell with common sense that it is filmed in slow motion just by the way the rocks go up into the air and fall to the ground. (seriously go film yourself throwing boulders and play it in slowmo). No blast crater under the lander either. We can't go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt. With the astronauts eyes closed they said they saw dots of light moving around. That's because the radiation went through their ship, through their space suits and through their skin and into their eyeballs, They weren't even that close to it! In 1994 (someone i forgot who) published in a newspaper stating that the "Van Allen Radiation Belt More Dangerous Than Previously Though". That was in 1994, if we had gone to the moon that would have never been published plain and simple. Yeah Buzz punched the guy who made the movie :A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon:, because the idiot ran up to him with a bible, calling him a liar and wanting him to swear on the Bible. But if you went to the moon wouldn't you just swear on the Bible if it was that easy to get people off your back? Neil Armstrong has never even given one interview about this in his life, not ONE. Why can you see them all lit up when they are standing in a pitch black shadow? I know, I know, they're standing on the moon and the sun is shining brightly and reflecting off the moons surface. Even if that were the case they wouldn't have been as lit up as they were in the pictures. I'm pretty sure it's not because of the camera's flash either. At the end of the piece of footage, you can clearly see the astronot's < reflection in the window when he pulls the stuff of the window that the camera was supposedly filming The Planet Earth out of and the giant earth is right outside the window. I don't know man. I KNOW for a fact that there are many fishy things about this. You can't just say " Oh your an idiot we went to the moon" if you don't do your own research on it. Russia spent 100 hours of time in space for America's every 20. They sent the first unmanned probe to the moon that crash landed. They had the first woman, monkey, and multiple crafts in space simultaneously a long time before the U.S. U.s was freaking out because we were no where even close to being ready to catch up and you can hear them say it if you find the right videos. Pres. Kennedy said it also. America was scared and out of ideas so they lied to the world to make themselves look like they had more capabilities of power than they did. They kept showing footage of it over, and over, and over, and people just didn't care anymore. T.V. stations had callers calling in and complaining that it was interrupting episodes of I Love Lucy. They got crap loads of money every time it aired. In the end it's all about Power and Money.

kidflash2008 · 04-22-2009, 10:47 AM

Actually, they align the suits used to get through the Van Allen Belt with gold (or some material that blocks the radiation). I would give credit to any senior citizen such as Mr Aldrin for decking the man who called him a liar. I have seen that part too, and talk about getting in one's face.

As I have stated, there would be many people coming forward if the moon landings were faked. Why would they keep the projects going, when one fake moon landing would suffice? They finally did cancel the project because of budget cuts and lack of public interest. I suggest looking at the Mythbusters' site on the moon hoax.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWMz...eature=related

BTW, I did not call you an idiot for believing we did not go to the moon. I am not mean or rude to the any other comments.

Clifurd · 04-22-2009, 03:49 PM

Yeah I can see how both of those could be true. I'm not completely doubting the brightness of the astronaut and the direction of the shadows. The chances of the shadows being parallel are very slim. I will do my own study on that soon enough. What I'm saying is that it's completely common sense to be able to tell what is wrong with the nasa moon landing footage. I will do some more looking at them and I will post links. Honestly as of right now I don't even know what the Van Allen Radiation Belt consists of. Honestly I'm not going to read my last post (too long lol) sorry but I don't remember accusing you of calling me an idiot?

kidflash2008 · 04-23-2009, 10:36 AM

Here is the sentence in which you imply as much:

You can't just say " Oh your an idiot we went to the moon" if you don't do your own research on it.

I may have interpreted to much into that statement.

I also know they spent much time worrying about how to deal with the effects of the radiation belt (which is used to protect Earth from cosmic and dangerous radiation from the cosmos and sun). The pressurized suit was made to deal with the vacuum of space, and it was lined with protection against the radiation from space. All the windows and the helmet had a thin layer of material to block out the harmful rays and yet allow for visibility.

The biggest problem with us not going to the moon is why did they fake more than one landing? That would of been too risky for them to get caught.

I am not saying it is impossible to fake it, but I would like to see more evidence on it.

Clifurd · 04-23-2009, 04:09 PM

Oh I see what you mean. I just typed the first thing that came to my mind, I didn't mean anything by it. I would like to see more evidence as well.

04-20-2009, 03:10 PM	#1
Clifurd Junior Investigator Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa Posts: 61	"Moon Landing" Where would topics such as exploiting the 'fakeness' of the supposed moon landing be posted?

04-22-2009, 10:47 AM	#7
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	Actually, they align the suits used to get through the Van Allen Belt with gold (or some material that blocks the radiation). I would give credit to any senior citizen such as Mr Aldrin for decking the man who called him a liar. I have seen that part too, and talk about getting in one's face. As I have stated, there would be many people coming forward if the moon landings were faked. Why would they keep the projects going, when one fake moon landing would suffice? They finally did cancel the project because of budget cuts and lack of public interest. I suggest looking at the Mythbusters' site on the moon hoax. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWMz...eature=related BTW, I did not call you an idiot for believing we did not go to the moon. I am not mean or rude to the any other comments. Last edited by kidflash2008; 04-22-2009 at 10:50 AM. Reason: added part 2

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-20-2009, 03:15 PM	#2
Mingus Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 325	Conspiracies, I suppose, though, since you've already made a thread, just make it here. Mods can move it.

04-20-2009, 03:23 PM	#3
Clifurd Junior Investigator Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa Posts: 61	Oh, fair enough lol. Thank you.

04-20-2009, 03:27 PM	#4
Clifurd Junior Investigator Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa Posts: 61	Has anyone reviewed the moon landing footage at a higher speed? Most of the ones on youtube are sped up either too much or not enough, so it makes them look strange. You can totally tell that they are in Earth's gravity though.

04-21-2009, 10:36 AM	#5
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	Sorry, Clifurd, but we did go to the moon. The logistics are there to prove it, and it would of meant thousands of people either kept in the dark or keeping their mouths shut on such a secret. Mythbusters did a good episode on the moon landing and did show how it would of been too difficult to fake the moon walk. It would also mean that all the astronauts who have been to the moon are lying. I do not see how that would be the case, and Buzz Aldrin did deck a man for calling him one. Put fake moon landing with the other urban legends.

04-21-2009, 09:18 PM	#6
Clifurd Junior Investigator Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa Posts: 61	ROFL. We CANNOT go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt. look up the movie: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon: it's only 40 min and the whole time they are building up your attention for one piece of footage that lasts about 10 min. To create the illusion that they were 130,000 miles above the earth, the astronauts put an object that was cut int a crescent shape and placed into the circle shaped window to fake the Earth's day and night shadow, and they blocked all points where sunlight could enter the craft and put the camera far away from the window so it looked like a planet from a distance. Really outside the window was nothing but earth because they were still in low orbit. Why, if they had a Color, high resolution camera, did they use that crappy black and white camera? why are there only 2 pictures of Armstrong? you can watch the footage of when they are on the moon. Another good point is that the shadows of the astronauts and other objects, intersect. Shadows do not intercept if there is only one source of light (the sun). Supposedly they used (can't remember how many) car batteries to run air conditioning to keep the Lunar Lander at a cool 70-some degrees when it was like 260 degrees outside. If you watch the "moon jeep" lol, footage at a faster rate you can completely tell with common sense that it is driving in earths gravity. Same thing with the video where they are throwing rocks, it's not a sped up video, it is still slow motion and you can still tell with common sense that it is filmed in slow motion just by the way the rocks go up into the air and fall to the ground. (seriously go film yourself throwing boulders and play it in slowmo). No blast crater under the lander either. We can't go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt. With the astronauts eyes closed they said they saw dots of light moving around. That's because the radiation went through their ship, through their space suits and through their skin and into their eyeballs, They weren't even that close to it! In 1994 (someone i forgot who) published in a newspaper stating that the "Van Allen Radiation Belt More Dangerous Than Previously Though". That was in 1994, if we had gone to the moon that would have never been published plain and simple. Yeah Buzz punched the guy who made the movie :A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon:, because the idiot ran up to him with a bible, calling him a liar and wanting him to swear on the Bible. But if you went to the moon wouldn't you just swear on the Bible if it was that easy to get people off your back? Neil Armstrong has never even given one interview about this in his life, not ONE. Why can you see them all lit up when they are standing in a pitch black shadow? I know, I know, they're standing on the moon and the sun is shining brightly and reflecting off the moons surface. Even if that were the case they wouldn't have been as lit up as they were in the pictures. I'm pretty sure it's not because of the camera's flash either. At the end of the piece of footage, you can clearly see the astronot's < reflection in the window when he pulls the stuff of the window that the camera was supposedly filming The Planet Earth out of and the giant earth is right outside the window. I don't know man. I KNOW for a fact that there are many fishy things about this. You can't just say " Oh your an idiot we went to the moon" if you don't do your own research on it. Russia spent 100 hours of time in space for America's every 20. They sent the first unmanned probe to the moon that crash landed. They had the first woman, monkey, and multiple crafts in space simultaneously a long time before the U.S. U.s was freaking out because we were no where even close to being ready to catch up and you can hear them say it if you find the right videos. Pres. Kennedy said it also. America was scared and out of ideas so they lied to the world to make themselves look like they had more capabilities of power than they did. They kept showing footage of it over, and over, and over, and people just didn't care anymore. T.V. stations had callers calling in and complaining that it was interrupting episodes of I Love Lucy. They got crap loads of money every time it aired. In the end it's all about Power and Money.

04-22-2009, 03:49 PM	#8
Clifurd Junior Investigator Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa Posts: 61	Yeah I can see how both of those could be true. I'm not completely doubting the brightness of the astronaut and the direction of the shadows. The chances of the shadows being parallel are very slim. I will do my own study on that soon enough. What I'm saying is that it's completely common sense to be able to tell what is wrong with the nasa moon landing footage. I will do some more looking at them and I will post links. Honestly as of right now I don't even know what the Van Allen Radiation Belt consists of. Honestly I'm not going to read my last post (too long lol) sorry but I don't remember accusing you of calling me an idiot?

04-23-2009, 10:36 AM	#9
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	Here is the sentence in which you imply as much: You can't just say " Oh your an idiot we went to the moon" if you don't do your own research on it. I may have interpreted to much into that statement. I also know they spent much time worrying about how to deal with the effects of the radiation belt (which is used to protect Earth from cosmic and dangerous radiation from the cosmos and sun). The pressurized suit was made to deal with the vacuum of space, and it was lined with protection against the radiation from space. All the windows and the helmet had a thin layer of material to block out the harmful rays and yet allow for visibility. The biggest problem with us not going to the moon is why did they fake more than one landing? That would of been too risky for them to get caught. I am not saying it is impossible to fake it, but I would like to see more evidence on it.

04-23-2009, 04:09 PM	#10
Clifurd Junior Investigator Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa Posts: 61	Oh I see what you mean. I just typed the first thing that came to my mind, I didn't mean anything by it. I would like to see more evidence as well.