Bob Lazar / John Lear

Area-51 · 10-13-2008, 08:15 AM

I think most of you, have already heard of them (Bob Lazar and John Lear). If not, then please check out some interviews on youtube.

So, do you guys belive them? I really believe in the Lazar story. He sounds so credible. He arguments very well on interviews. Hm......Well, he credible to me.

And then there's John Lear. Most of those things he tells, I really enjoy and believe, just a few, I think, are hoaxes. Also he make Lazar even ,ore credible, because he underlines his story. On the other hand, Lazar does the same with Lear's story.

So, do you think, they are credible persons, who are just telling about there expirience, or do you think, they are hoaxers?
Bu remember, they have one guy, who makes there story even more credible: Georg Knapp. He, Bob Lazar and John Lear were out in the desert to UFO's and they did, if Bob Lazar is telling the truth. (for everyone, who don't know Georg Knapp: He's a newscaster (don't know if the word is correct) on Las Vegas televison.)

kidflash2008 · 10-13-2008, 08:32 AM

Bob Lazar is not telling the truth.
1. He claimed to bring home element 115, but according to nuclear physicists it would have a very short life of less than a second.
2. His "pay stub" states that he was payed by the government when he was employed by the contractor. The contractor would take care of pay and other personnel paper work.
3. He went to work immediately, even though it would of taken many months to get the required security clearance. He would of had a hack job until he was cleared to work on any classified material.
4. There is no record of him attending the schools he claimed to attend. Some think it was a government hack job to erase his identity, but why go through all that work when they could make him disappear?

I was in the military and know how a few things work. Most of these so-called whistleblowers seem like very nice people, but they have not one shred of evidence to back them up. They may tell a convincing tale, but the devil is in the details. Take what they say as a grain of salt, and try to get all the information on them before believing them. Many of the whistleblowers just want to sell a book/DVD, and just want to take your hard earned money.

John Lear had on his website that the moon has a breathable atmosphere. Not a very good start if you want credibility.

I think George Knapp is in it for the ratings. He is a newscaster, as a journalist would of done their homework on these guys.

Read the interview with Kevin Randle. He is a good researcher and is not afraid to counter some of the craziness in ufology. Here is his blog:

http://www.kevinrandle.blogspot.com/

Area-51 · 10-14-2008, 01:31 AM

thanks for the link, I'll check it, out!

(Good answer, by the way!)

10-13-2008, 08:15 AM	#1
Area-51 Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Germany Posts: 459	Bob Lazar / John Lear I think most of you, have already heard of them (Bob Lazar and John Lear). If not, then please check out some interviews on youtube. So, do you guys belive them? I really believe in the Lazar story. He sounds so credible. He arguments very well on interviews. Hm......Well, he credible to me. And then there's John Lear. Most of those things he tells, I really enjoy and believe, just a few, I think, are hoaxes. Also he make Lazar even ,ore credible, because he underlines his story. On the other hand, Lazar does the same with Lear's story. So, do you think, they are credible persons, who are just telling about there expirience, or do you think, they are hoaxers? Bu remember, they have one guy, who makes there story even more credible: Georg Knapp. He, Bob Lazar and John Lear were out in the desert to UFO's and they did, if Bob Lazar is telling the truth. (for everyone, who don't know Georg Knapp: He's a newscaster (don't know if the word is correct) on Las Vegas televison.)

10-13-2008, 08:32 AM	#2
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	Bob Lazar is not telling the truth. 1. He claimed to bring home element 115, but according to nuclear physicists it would have a very short life of less than a second. 2. His "pay stub" states that he was payed by the government when he was employed by the contractor. The contractor would take care of pay and other personnel paper work. 3. He went to work immediately, even though it would of taken many months to get the required security clearance. He would of had a hack job until he was cleared to work on any classified material. 4. There is no record of him attending the schools he claimed to attend. Some think it was a government hack job to erase his identity, but why go through all that work when they could make him disappear? I was in the military and know how a few things work. Most of these so-called whistleblowers seem like very nice people, but they have not one shred of evidence to back them up. They may tell a convincing tale, but the devil is in the details. Take what they say as a grain of salt, and try to get all the information on them before believing them. Many of the whistleblowers just want to sell a book/DVD, and just want to take your hard earned money. John Lear had on his website that the moon has a breathable atmosphere. Not a very good start if you want credibility. I think George Knapp is in it for the ratings. He is a newscaster, as a journalist would of done their homework on these guys. Read the interview with Kevin Randle. He is a good researcher and is not afraid to counter some of the craziness in ufology. Here is his blog: http://www.kevinrandle.blogspot.com/ Last edited by kidflash2008; 10-13-2008 at 08:43 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-14-2008, 01:31 AM	#3
Area-51 Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Germany Posts: 459	thanks for the link, I'll check it, out! (Good answer, by the way!)