![]() |
||
|
|
#1 | |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 325
|
I can't believe AIG had the balls to use money like that again. The government ought to be able to force them out of the market, because they obviously are beholden to themselves and quit functioning as a business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Administrator
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,079
|
Although I agree that AIG is a bunch of greedy assholes, this is just proof the government should have never got involved. I don't think its right for the government to tell them how to run their business, but then again, its ran by OUR money now, shouldn't we get to vote?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Investigator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,699
|
We own 80% of AIG, and should have a say. The major problem was the Justice and other regulatory committees that allowed AIG and the others to get to big to fail. Unfortunately, those bonuses were in contracts made before the bailout and nothing can be done about them.
It is time for a Teddy Roosevelt to carry a big stick and bust up the monopolies and robber barons again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 325
|
I believe that's called Obama and the Democratic Senate. Obama's bipartisanship should end on this issue, make it a rather unilateral decision in which the government will dictate to AIG what it can and cannot do. At least until the public ownership is turned over to private ownership again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Investigator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: currently on Earth, in CT
Posts: 56
|
This is like one mob family snuffin out another and the public cheers. All Business owners have one thing in mind, MONEY. Ruling a nation, its a business. They have their greed but noone else can. At least AIG can't send its employees to other countries to snuff out the competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 325
|
I'm operating under the impression that Obama wants a clean government. In this theoretical system, the government would not be a corporation and thus would be morally upright in forcing a corrupt and obviously defunct company out of business. It's more akin to what happened to Roy Bryant's store in Mississippi after the obviously rigged Emmett Till murder trial cleared him and his brother and then they turned around and admitted to the deed. The black community in Money, Mississippi stopped going to the store, forcing it out of business (the store was the segregation-era counterpart to the whites-only store; therefore, if the blacks stopped going to the store catering to them, it went out of business).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Investigator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,699
|
The problem is, President Obama and Congress are legally bound to honor those bonuses. They were in place way before the problems, and when the TARP money was drawn up, the bonuses were kept in place.
They all can get angry and act indignant to put on a show for us public. However, it is just more hot wind from Washington DC. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|