Debunking the illusion that jfk's head moved forward

[7forever]

This silly argument has been used by government loyalists for decades but finally it can be shown to be an illusion. His head appears to move forward slightly between 312-313 but what really happens is jfk's bottom skull half gapes open providing this illusion. What these crazies failed to show is someone besides jfk, shot from the rear that goes forward slightly, stops, and violently goes backward. It's impossible on its face but debunking any jfk myth is good because there are so many and this one is used by both conspiracy kooks and WC supporters.

If you look at the top rear of his head and hair, it never moves forward of the white line. The bottom half of his skull gapes open from front impact causing this illusion that I figured out only two days ago. After two years things keep coming to me and this one is important for both debunking goverment crazies and disinfo idiots who promote two shots to the head.


This capture shows perfectly the rear skull gaped open with the top and bottom on the same vertical level.

Notice that jfk's nose never moves but his head appears to move forward because of the rear starting to break.

What happened is jfk's forehead absorbed the impact making his head kind of straighten before slamming backward. This can be seen in nix also.

Watch his right front kind of contract from impact.

[7forever]

Originally Posted by bobster

no matter how many times i look at it, there's still a gap there from him moving his head. you helped illustrate this movement by drawing the lines on, so thankyou

Of course there's a gap in the middle where the exit wound was but the top rear never moves forward of the white line. The exit wound's clearly on the right rear at the moment of front impact.

[7forever]

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

The only silly argument is that a gaping wound can create the illusion that his head moved forward.

Sorry but one has nothing to do with the other in fact your posted images clearly showed that his head did move forward slightly before the wound appeared.

As with the rest of your empty and false claims this one fails

The only silly argument is that a gaping wound could cause any head to move slightly in one direction before reversing violently in the opposite direction.

Sorry, but one has everything thing to do with the other and in fact the images clearly show that his head did not move forward slightly before the wound appeared.

As with the rest of your empty and false claims of government support, this one fails, as have all the others.

[biggabum]

Of course there is the explaination that his head does in fact move forwards slightly if Greer applied the brakes his head would have moved forward from momentum.

Not disagreeing with you mate, just looking at all the possibilities.

[7forever]

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

The images clearly show that his head did move forward before going back and to the left.

Everyone looking at YOUR post sees that his head moves forward of the white line which you placed in the picture. Sorry but you are proven wrong it did move forward consistent with a shot from behind.

Like all of your claims you simply deny reality to make up an imaginary scenario

Everyone looking at the gif sees that the top rear never moves forward. Sorry, but this myth is debunked and his head did not move forward with the fantasy shot from behind.

[7forever]

Originally Posted by biggabum

Of course there is the explaination that his head does in fact move forwards slightly if Greer applied the brakes his head would have moved forward from momentum.

Not disagreeing with you mate, just looking at all the possibilities.

I will address that in another post.

[7forever]

Originally Posted by daws101

you first, here's how this works....YOU are the plaintiff, it is incumbent upon you to prove your allegations .I've ask you to show credible proof ..you have not...that can only lead to one logical conclusion you have none ..so you're makin' shit up!:lol:

YOU support the WC, it is incumbent upon you to TRY AND prove their fantasies. I won't ask you to show credible proof because there isn't any...that can only lead to one logical conclusion, you have none, so you're supporting proven lies. JFK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT.

A MAN SHOT FROM THE REAR GOING FORWARD, LOGICALLY.

[0obleck]

Whats logical is that the man being executed would need to be in a moving vehicle in order to make a comparison. Also, have you considered that the reason only JFKs body fell back during acceleration was because his body was the only one which went limp?

How did the passenger know the gun was dropped when he was clearly looking in the opposite direction?

[7forever]

Originally Posted by K-Wurx

Sorry dude but his head is clearly moving forward. Not just the mid section of it, the whole damn thing. Not to mention, the bottom of the skull you are referring to is his neck...I can clearly see where his hair is and it moves FORWARD. And unless the bullet was of explosive content, the exit wound is where the spray usually goes. If he was shot in the front the spray would be BEHIND his head.

Sorry dude but his head is NOT moving forward. Not just the mid section of it, the whole damn thing. Not to mention, the bottom of the skull is blown out...you can clearly see where his hair is and it does not move FORWARD. the exit wound is where the gape is on the right rear. If he was shot in the rear he would have went forward like this guy.

The top of his head does not forward of the white which is proven by the rear exit.

[7forever]

Originally Posted by 0obleck

Whats logical is that the man being executed would need to be in a moving vehicle in order to make a comparison. Also, have you considered that the reason only JFKs body fell back during acceleration was because his body was the only one which went limp?

How did the passenger know the gun was dropped when he was clearly looking in the opposite direction?

Kellerman was involved. How could he not be, sitting right next to Greer?