|
||
 |
11-19-2009, 01:59 PM
|
#1 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 419
|
Can you see the sandals?
What do you notice first?
The beach? The beautiful blue sea? The general pleasing 'feel' of the picture? The cloudless sky? My fiancee? I dunno, I just.... like this picture.
__________________
|
|
|
|
11-19-2009, 02:06 PM
|
#2 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 419
|
She's not my fiancee actually.....
I prefer chubby blondes.... lol..... mind you, saying that, I wouldn't kick her out of bed for farting. *update* I've had a good old look at this pic.... There has been photoshop action to the left side of her head. BUT.... and this is bizzarre thing, the UFO isn't edited!
__________________
Last edited by Tecnos; 11-20-2009 at 03:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 02:09 AM
|
#3 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 143
|
Funnily enough!, i didnt see the "UFO" for quite some time for some reason!, even with a big red arrow pointing at it!, Amazing scenery!
__________________
OPEN YOUR MIND!  
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 08:03 AM
|
#4 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 195
|
Yeah. Nice sunglasses she's sport'n.
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2009, 02:23 PM
|
#5 |
|
Junior Investigator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: in occupied territory U.S.A
Posts: 20
|
i think the u.f.o is a frisbee or a blurr of a plain
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2009, 11:50 AM
|
#6 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 419
|
This is is a technical examination of the photograph of the very sexy UFO pic that I have posted. It is intended to rebuff any suggestion of motion blur that might have occured if an aeroplane was flying past.....
1: This area has been photoshopped. The texture is notably different to the texture examination of the rest of the sky. It is smoother than the naturally organic background in the rest of the picture. 2 & 3: These are clouds. Notice the slight elevation in the texture. Compare these to other objects in the picture that have a defined edge, eg; the people, and more importantly, metallic objects, the umberellas, the sunbeds, so on and so forth.... This then brings us to the UFO itself. It is a metallic (hard) object. It is STATIC. There is no motion blur, its shape is as you see it on the pic, and is a well defined, non organic object, which at the time the picture was taken, was not travelling. These conclusions are not up for debate. (by me anyway)..... Hope this helps. Tecnos xxx Want further proof? Compare the form shift of the UFO with the red arrow. Can you see how the 'hard' lines compare?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2009, 07:45 AM
|
#7 |
|
Investigator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 114
|
if i were in a ufo i'd be checking her out too
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
