Video "Artifacts" from 1947 UFO crash San Augustin N.M tested in electrostatic field

meteorlima · 02-26-2009, 03:08 PM

N/A

kidflash2008 · 02-27-2009, 09:43 AM

San Augustin is still considered to be a hoax because the alleged main witness was actually in Arizona that summer (that was proven by his wife). Diaries have been faked and all kinds of other problems with the case arise. It is still possible that is where the alleged second crash took place, but there needs to be a good witness come forward. Time is running out for that to happen.

Tecnos · 02-27-2009, 01:54 PM

ahem! *cough~bollocks!*

Truthed · 02-28-2009, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tecnos

ahem! *cough~bollocks!*

LOL whenever i hear someone say bollocks it reminds me of the scene in V for Vendetta when the public realized the government is full of shit!

sorry to go off topic

Tecnos · 02-28-2009, 03:02 PM

Pretty much the image that I wanted to convey!

kidflash2008 · 03-01-2009, 09:30 AM

Tecnos, are you replying bullocks to the article or my reply?

Get the book "A History of UFO Crashes" by Kevin Randle. He devotes a whole chapter to this one, and he shows all the reasons against such a crash.

Tecnos · 03-02-2009, 06:10 AM

Kidflash - Chill!

The article is bollocks, the films are bollocks.....

lol - and it's not 'bullocks' as they are baby bulls...

It's bollocks as in: testicles, cojones......

kidflash2008 · 03-03-2009, 09:25 AM

I was just curious as you did not make any distinction, and some people take their beliefs of these crash sites very personally. I do find crash cases interesting, but I am one to believe they are not very common at all (one crash every decade or two).

Again, there is always a possibility that the area could be where the second alleged disk crashed, but there is no real evidence to support that.

Tecnos · 03-03-2009, 09:46 AM

Whilst I am a conspiracist... and yes I am.....

I can smell 'toro mierda' a mile off!

I'm sorry, but those particular videos and others of their ilk, serve no other purpose than that of discrediting the legitimate information that does exist.

If it weren't for the like of 'fakers and phonies' maybe the general truth might have been seen by society before now.

As it is, those of us who believe, are still labeled and cast aside along with the crackpots and hicks who 'litter the path to enllightenment'.

I was being sarcastic then, by the way.

KidFlash, I am in no way hacking on you/having a pop at you, moreover these videos, that are, in my opinion are bordering on comedy.

We're all on the same side and it annoys me that we're hindered by 'toro mierda' - (bullshit) or in other words: bollocks!

kidflash2008 · 03-04-2009, 11:51 AM

I did not watch those posted videos as I have read Major Kevin Randle's book on UFO crashes. He went into depth on the alleged crash at San Augustin and believes it is a hoax. I tend to agree it is a hoax, unless we get some real physical evidence, or an actual eyewitness that can pass muster.

I agree with you Tecnos, that the links are high on the bullshit meter, but that many UFO "researchers" make their money selling books and DVDs trying to get people to believe in every single crash site.

02-26-2009, 03:08 PM	#1
meteorlima Junior Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 8	Video "Artifacts" from 1947 UFO crash San Augustin N.M tested in electrostatic field N/A Last edited by meteorlima; 03-14-2009 at 01:23 AM.

02-27-2009, 01:54 PM	#3
Tecnos Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: UK Posts: 419	ahem! cough~bollocks! __________________

02-28-2009, 03:02 PM	#5
Tecnos Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: UK Posts: 419	Pretty much the image that I wanted to convey! __________________

03-02-2009, 06:10 AM	#7
Tecnos Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: UK Posts: 419	Kidflash - Chill! The article is bollocks, the films are bollocks..... lol - and it's not 'bullocks' as they are baby bulls... It's bollocks as in: testicles, cojones...... __________________

03-03-2009, 09:46 AM	#9
Tecnos Investigator Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: UK Posts: 419	Whilst I am a conspiracist... and yes I am..... I can smell 'toro mierda' a mile off! I'm sorry, but those particular videos and others of their ilk, serve no other purpose than that of discrediting the legitimate information that does exist. If it weren't for the like of 'fakers and phonies' maybe the general truth might have been seen by society before now. As it is, those of us who believe, are still labeled and cast aside along with the crackpots and hicks who 'litter the path to enllightenment'. I was being sarcastic then, by the way. KidFlash, I am in no way hacking on you/having a pop at you, moreover these videos, that are, in my opinion are bordering on comedy. We're all on the same side and it annoys me that we're hindered by 'toro mierda' - (bullshit) or in other words: bollocks! __________________

02-27-2009, 09:43 AM	#2
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	San Augustin is still considered to be a hoax because the alleged main witness was actually in Arizona that summer (that was proven by his wife). Diaries have been faked and all kinds of other problems with the case arise. It is still possible that is where the alleged second crash took place, but there needs to be a good witness come forward. Time is running out for that to happen.

03-01-2009, 09:30 AM	#6
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	Tecnos, are you replying bullocks to the article or my reply? Get the book "A History of UFO Crashes" by Kevin Randle. He devotes a whole chapter to this one, and he shows all the reasons against such a crash.

03-03-2009, 09:25 AM	#8
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	I was just curious as you did not make any distinction, and some people take their beliefs of these crash sites very personally. I do find crash cases interesting, but I am one to believe they are not very common at all (one crash every decade or two). Again, there is always a possibility that the area could be where the second alleged disk crashed, but there is no real evidence to support that.

03-04-2009, 11:51 AM	#10
kidflash2008 Senior Investigator Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,699	I did not watch those posted videos as I have read Major Kevin Randle's book on UFO crashes. He went into depth on the alleged crash at San Augustin and believes it is a hoax. I tend to agree it is a hoax, unless we get some real physical evidence, or an actual eyewitness that can pass muster. I agree with you Tecnos, that the links are high on the bullshit meter, but that many UFO "researchers" make their money selling books and DVDs trying to get people to believe in every single crash site.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode